Motivated by the severe criticism the Hilali and Khan (HK) Translation of the Holy Quran has received for its too many parenthetical insertions, this study aimed at linguistically realizing how such added pieces of information could be for necessary cohesive explicitness or worthless redundant interpolation. Methodically, the HK translation of the first 8 verses of Chapter 18 (The Cave, Surah Al Kahf) of the Holy Quran was selected to be a subject material. A number of 15 instances of explicitation put in parentheses were encountered; they were found to be based upon 23 cohesive (grammatical/lexical) relationships and, hence, to be considered as ones of cohesive explicitness. Eventually, such an analysis could be of use for modifying the available translations of the Holy Quran.

---

Journal: International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 2015, 4(5)

This paper aimed at justifying the lexical departure from formal correspondence by means of omission, addition or substitution in translation from English into Arabic. A classification of four linguistic (semantic or pragmatic) relationships was developed; such relationships were considered as grounds of justification of lexical departure from formal correspondence in translation. This classification was applied to the Arabic translations of a number of extracts taken out of sociopolitical speeches delivered by Martin Luther King. The acts of lexical omission, addition and substitution were found to be translational strategies based upon the referential, collocative, connotative or situational relationships between the SL/TL omitted, added or substituted lexical units of language and the SL/TL context.

---

Journal: International Journal of Linguistics, 2014, 6(6)

The aim of this paper is to focus on the accepted number of arbitrators in law and practice. It is common practice for arbitration agreements to address the number of the arbitrators. Selecting the number of arbitrators is one of the most critical issues in arbitration and it is vitally important to the effectiveness and speed of the arbitration process. Indeed, arbitration clauses often specify the number of persons who will comprise the tribunal in the event of future disputes. However, if the parties do not agree upon the number of arbitrators, institutional rules usually grant the institution power to do so. On the other hand and in the case of ad hoc arbitration, national courts will have the power to decide on the default number rules in based on the arbitration legislation. This paper points out that although the sole or odd number for an arbitral tribunal is commonly used to the extent that it seems to be the only accepted rule, the even number is also accepted under certain trades, rules and legislation, nationally and internationally. Many questions arise from applying the odd number in arbitration, which this paper aims to answer. Moreover, there are some conditions that need to be met in the case of choosing an even number. This paper highlights the underpinning arguments behind both the odd and even number rules in arbitration, evaluating the advantages and disadvantages of each case. 

---

Journal: Saharia and Law, VOLume 45, No. 2,Supplement 2,2018

Journal:

In this paper, we extend the notion of classical soft expert sets to possibility neutrosophic vague soft expert sets by applying the theory of soft expert sets to possibility neutrosophic vague soft sets. The subset, complement, union , intersection, AND and OR operations as well as some related concepts pertaining to this notion are defined.

---

Journal: AIP Conference Proceedings 1830, 010001 (2017); doi: 10.1063/1.4980863

We introduce the mapping on complex neutrosophic soft expert sets. Further, we investigated the basic operations and other related properties of complex neutrosophic soft expert image and complex neutrosophic soft expert inverse image of complex neutrosophic soft expert sets.

---

Journal: AIP Conference Proceedings 1940, 020111 (2018); doi: 10.1063/1.5028026